W23Reptilocracy 🦎🏛️ Good Days, Bad Days
Teaser
We do not ask if the leader is sane, we only ask if he is currently having a good day.
TLDR
We monitor his temperament like the afternoon humidity. We gossip about his moods but never audit his psychological fitness. The stamp is waterproof.Context
The office spends a lot of time checking the barometer. If he is sunny, we toast. If he is stormy, we move the fragile glassware to the basement. We treat his temperament like a local weather report rather than a structural risk.
No one mentions psychological fitness during the briefing. That would be rude. We discuss his energy and his charm and his outbursts as if they were mere atmospheric shifts. It is much easier to gossip about a mood than to audit a mind.
The red ink does not care about the expression. The clerk slams the emergency stamp across the smile and the scream with equal indifference. The powers are granted. The weather is irrelevant.
BUT WHY:
This is part of an experiment: we are keeping count of how many scenes it takes before we agree that leaders with real power should prove they are psychologically fit to hold it.
By turning our instincts and hive habits into animals, the project asks why we still let untested nervous systems run entire societies.
In a world where one unstable nervous system can scale to entire institutions, this project treats Reptilocracy as the cartoon diagnosis and points to one concrete step: the Change.org petition (Stronger Checks and Balances: Psychological Fitness for Australia’s Top Leaders).