<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>KnowYourPolitics on behaviorengineering.ai</title><link>https://behaviorengineering.ai/tags/knowyourpolitics/</link><description>Recent content in KnowYourPolitics on behaviorengineering.ai</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:00:00 +1100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://behaviorengineering.ai/tags/knowyourpolitics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>🎲🩸 Politics is a bloodless war game that ends in zero-sum</title><link>https://behaviorengineering.ai/social-protocols/2026-04-28-candor-zero-sum-politics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:00:00 +1100</pubDate><guid>https://behaviorengineering.ai/social-protocols/2026-04-28-candor-zero-sum-politics/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="where-this-started"&gt;Where this started&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I worked through a short tour of the &lt;strong&gt;iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Tit for Tat&lt;/strong&gt;. These models show how repeated interaction rewards &lt;strong&gt;clarity&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;reciprocity&lt;/strong&gt;. The pattern clicked immediately. I compressed that tour into a &lt;a href="https://behaviorengineering.ai/social-protocols/2026-04-26-prisoner-dilemma-tit-for-tat/" rel=""&gt;curated video page&lt;/a&gt;. I never used the model as proof; it just lit the social pattern for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="avoidance-does-not-delete-the-fight"&gt;Avoidance does not delete the fight&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Politics (office politics too) trains people to keep faces intact. You soften feedback, bury tradeoffs, and route conflict through jokes, proxies, and timing. You feel kinder in the moment, but you are just delaying the bill.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>